Thursday, March 28, 2013
The Naked Female Warriors
Sunday, March 17, 2013
DHARMA & RELIGION
Monday, March 04, 2013
All About 'Sensible Sensuality'
Sunday, March 03, 2013
All About ‘The Dark Abode’

Sangeeta Singh: You have used the Uma Shakti Myth in your novel The Dark Abode. Some scholars might blame you for promoting the Hindu religion and marginalizing women who don't follow Hinduism.
Saturday, March 02, 2013
At Indira Gandhi Tribal University, Amarkantak, on February 27 & 28, 2013

Monday, February 25, 2013
Friday, January 04, 2013
Cry My Country, Cry!!!!
Monday, November 19, 2012
My Poems in Chinese
夫妻小畫像
我們靜坐著,我們兩個,
白天過去了,黑暗已到,
眾鳥回巢
夜開始了。
我們無所謂地等待著
這是否是個黑暗
或月明之夜。
我們靜坐著
好些小動物
像樹葉,圍繞在我們四周;
但我們沒去搭理。
天更黑了
以致我們不能看見對方。
我們靜坐著
雖沒交談一句話,
但能感覺到對方的呼吸。
我們繼續靜坐著
露水落下來了
迷霧籠罩在我們四周。
然後我覺得雙腳冰冷了。
但在我凍僵以前,
有人把手放到我的手上。
烏鴉
「你為什麼喊我?
你不知道我已離棄
我小小的內在世界了嗎?
我手上穿有我的短襪;
冬天早上
我不需沐浴,
或塗卡札和新大(譯註1)。
也不需托著缽。
我願成為他的唯一
誰人尋找或希求之物。」
看不到烏鴉;
牠們都隨兀鷹飛走了。
說不定什麼時候會飛回來,
在娑納.瑪尼的路旁小吃店吃東西。
我問他:
你住在哪個村子?
你要去哪裡?
你的親戚呢?
你什麼時候和他們失去連絡的?
瑪尼.沙湖的兒子芮巴替.納丹哭泣著要看烏鴉
我在人行道遍尋不著
最後只得以童書裡的烏鴉圖
安撫他。
他一下爆笑開來。
精靈的動物!
竟有如此口渴?
在炙熱的太陽下演出如此戲劇?(譯註2)
我的房子裡以前有一個籠子
假如那烏鴉不是一個流浪者
我當時會請牠住在裡頭。
跑離吃剩的食物
他現在蹲坐在
瑪尼亞.巴巴的灰爐前圓凳上
似乎陷入沉思!
你不應想跑走。
你需要一個托缽嗎?
它只是一個小港灣的形狀。
你可知道,
在我父親的葬禮上
我兄弟如何掛意你
即使靈魂翱翔
在柴堆燒成的骨灰上?
譯註1:卡札(Kajual)為印度當地婦女用以畫眼線的化妝品。新大(Sindur)為印度當地已女性置放額頭上以隔開頭髮的傳統紅色或橘紅色化妝品。
譯註2:有那麼個民間傳說童話故事:烏鴉口渴至極,到處無水可喝,只有一個水瓶,所盛之水極少,烏鴉無法取飲,乃銜卵石投入瓶中,卵石越投越多,水終於向上浮起,烏鴉乃得償喝水之欲望。作者鄰居小孩芮巴替.納丹亟欲看烏鴉而不可得,以致哭泣不止,作者乃以童書上的烏鴉圖充當,「安撫他。他一下爆笑開來。」那是芮巴替.納丹滿意的爆笑。作者用的是這個典故。
父親
你隨處在,我卻找不到你。
為什麼?
到處漂泊,你定於一處了。
為什麼?
樹葉生長;樹葉成蔭;樹葉凋零
風強,寒冷的十一月冰凍了萬物
你仍頑抗,像寺廟的尖頂。
為什麼?
及時吃食;吃食後口渴;口渴後疲乏
但你的敲門聲仍然響在疲乏、口渴和吃食的門口,
好像你是一個戰士要奮戰到最後。
我受蔭於眾鳥群集的樹下
至今似乎未變,你雖距我很近,卻離我很遠。
你伸展你的枝葉,不管有否呼叫牠們,牠們確定會來
從蚱蜢到蝴蝶,牠們都感到受保護
從你的頭到腳爬遍你的肢體
但你平靜,無動於衷。
啄木鳥求取你的枝葉庇護
其他的鳥歌唱,下完蛋飛走
但你坐在那裡等牠們回來。
血脈乾了,視矚模糊了
身上樹皮掉了。
雖然你還在
死卻悄悄讓你不見。
我受蔭於眾鳥群集的樹下
至今似乎未變,你雖距我很近,卻離我很遠。
扎耙
你敲擊土地
它回你
以金屬聲。
你再次敲擊
它吐出滿腹悲傷
報答以水滴。
扎耙等待著
以吸墨紙般的
渴欲。
它讓眼睛
望著小帆船似的粉紅車輛:
拜託,可否給我
一滴雨水?
似乎水歌唱著,
喃喃而語,
滿溢熱情。
水感到慰藉了嗎?
按:這是印度女性主義作家沙羅吉妮.沙和(Sarojini Sahoo)寫就自譯英文的四首詩,曾由伊朗女詩人Maryam Ala Amjadi譯成伊朗文。她是南亞一位傑出的雙語女作家,印度英文雜誌AGE的助理編輯,國際英文日報專欄作家,曾被在Kolkata出版的英文雜誌Kindle列名為25位傑出女性,曾獲1993年Orissa Sahitya獎、1992年Jhankar獎及、Bhubaneswar書展獎和Prajatantra獎等,同時是Kerala地方Newman學院出版Indian Jounal of Post Colonial Literature的顧問。文本係由作者電郵給譯者。
Monday, March 07, 2011
Is Euthanasia Killing or Giving Freedom to an Exiled Soul?

‘Active euthanasia’ (mercy killing) is still illegal in India while 'passive euthanasia' may be permissible in exceptional circumstances, according to a recent decision by the Supreme Court of India. The court recently dismissed a plea for mercy killing brought by writer/journalist Pinky Virani on behalf of a 60-year-old nurse, living in a vegetative state for the past 37 years in a Mumbai hospital after a brutal sexual assault.
Case Background:
Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug, a nurse of KEM Hospital in Mumbai, was raped by a ward boy in1973. Aruna was menstruating on that day and therefore, the rapist did not penetrate her but instead choked her with a dog chain and raped her anally. She bled for days from the anus and the attempted asphyxiation had cut off oxygen supply to her brain resulting in a brain stem contusion injury and cervical cord injury apart from leaving her cortically blind. She went into a coma after that incident and was pronounced brain dead.
Currently, she cannot speak, hear, or see; she is unable to communicate in any manner. And she is force-fed every day. The former nurse has become 'featherweight' and her bones are brittle. Her wrists are twisted inward and her teeth are totally decayed. Also, she is now prone to bed sores as a result of being unable to move by herself and in one position most of the time.
The Legal Issues:
The injustice first done with Aruna after those brutal happenings was that her attacker was punished not for rape or sexual molestation, nor for the "unnatural sexual offense" (which could have got him a ten-year sentence by itself) but rather for assault and robbery for which he received a total effective sentence of seven-years with each offense running concurrently.
A writer cum journalist, Pinky Virani, filed a petition in the Supreme Court for a passive euthanasia for Aruna, to which the honourable judges rejected the plea as there is currently no law in place for euthanasia. The bench, however, did say even though there is no law presently in the country on euthanasia, that mercy killing of a terminally-ill patient ‘under the doctrine of passive euthanasia’ can be resorted to in exceptional cases. But the bench clarified that until Parliament enacts a law regarding euthanasia, its most recent judgment on active and passive euthanasia will be in force.
However, the Supreme Court did make some suggested guidelines with regard to passive euthanasia but they were not immediately available, according to reports.
Conclusion:
So the Supreme Court of India seems not to reject the idea of passive euthanasia. It is the lack of a law which made the honourable judges give the verdict against Aruna’s petition for mercy killing. We hope the Indian Parliament will pass a bill for passive Euthanasia so that Aruna may forever have the peace and freedom she deserves.
I am not a supporter of mercy killing or euthanasia in every step but while making it a law may create many hazards and complications in society, it can be highly essential in some cases like Aruna’s. And we can’t just shut our eyes and force Aruna to live a life, practically which she is not living at all.
I hope the Supreme Court will someday permit passive euthanasia for Aruna (alas they could not, because there is no perfect law regarding this in our country) so she could have the peace and freedom she deserves.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
23-March, A Day for Challenging Beliefs and Faith

The day 23 March has great importance in history and today again proved its importance in Indian History. This day is famous because it is the birthday of great Socialist thinker Ram Monahar Lohia. This day is also famous because in the colonial period, Bhagat Singh, a leftist freedom fighter, was hung by British rulers along with his two other comrades. Today, this day becomes significant because Kanu Sanyal, one of the premier left-wing terrorist (they say revolutionary) thinkers committed suicide by hanging himself in his home.
Twenty-three-March is a symbolic day as it is commonly associated with events having connections with socialism and other leftist activities. The day 23 March is associated with two other hangings; one was imposed and the other was a suicide. But moreover, it made me think about the reason that made the socialist like Kanu Sanyal follow the path of suicide. As per their concept and consciousness, the leftists always act as most optimistic in their ideology and also in their activities. The socialists or communists or Marxists are not like the French Existentialist writer Albert Camus in that they will think the reason why people are not committing suicide even though they face a meaningless lifestyle in their day-to-day lives.
In the seventies, Kanu Sanyal and Charu Majumdar were the two names who gave a new turn to Indian politics, though never they had entered into any level of Indian government. In fact, they spent most of their years in prison. But they brought the name of a small village ‘Naxalbari’ into the Indian mainstream, which has still been existing as Naxal activities or has been synonymous with Maoist activities. The Naxal movement of seventies only affected Kolkata and few villages of West Bengal or Andhra Pradesh. It had little effect on either Orissa or in Bihar (now known as Jharkhand). Now, Naxal or Maoist activities have spread from Nepal to Maharashtra, including more than seven states of India.
In the seventies, the Naxals announced that power would generate from the barrel rather than from the ballot box. They adopted the violent methods of Bakunin’s or Mao Tse-tung’s anarchist class struggle. Bakunin was buried into ignorance and Mao Tse-tung’s Redbook was exiled from his beloved country of China. Still it remained in South Asia with the goal of establishing a new form of “State,” which after the end of cold war, became itself an insignificant one.
Naxal is now synonymous with terrorism, what in the seventies neither Charu nor Kanu thought any day. In later times, Kanu Sanyal kept himself away from the leftist government and so-called contemporary Maoist activities. And at last, he was found hung in his room in his village near Naxalbari.
Away from the political observer’s guessing and remarks, what made me to think more about the actual cause of Kanu Sanyal’s committing suicide that it is the fate of any faith or belief that lacks the capability to bind any people permanently for a lifetime, even lacking its control over its creator.
Going back to history, in 543 BC, on a full-moon day of May (the month of Baisakha in the Hindu Calendar), on his deathbed, Buddha uttered his last words, “All component things in the world are changeable. They are not lasting.”
The realisations of Buddha and Albert Camus (in Myth of Sisyphus) and Kanu Sanyal are the same, even though they represent different ways. Are they nihilistic in their approach? As a social thinker, will anyone be an optimistic one? It is a great question, a great crisis and still for me, it seems like an unsolved puzzle. The suicide of Kanu Sanyal makes us think of this crisis of all beliefs and faiths again and again.